Guest Editorials, Opinion

Constitution not based on the Bible

Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri gave a speech last Monday explaining what he views as the biblical foundations of American government.

“Without the Bible, there is no modernity,” Hawley told the National Conservatism Conference. “Without the Bible, there is no America.”

“We are a revolutionary nation precisely because we are heirs of the revolution of the Bible,” Hawley said. No. Our constitutional government, and therefore our nation, isn’t based on the Bible, or any religious text.

While most of the nation’s founders generally believed in a creator, they were skeptics about the Bible’s potential influence on secular government. Many were deists who believed in a God who created free thought, and did not interfere in the affairs of men and women.

Revolutionary writer Thomas Paine attacked the Bible relentlessly. Thomas Jefferson, who wrote the Declaration of Independence, used a razor on the New Testament, taking out parts he thought were based on superstition or nonsense.

James Madison is considered the primary author of the Constitution. “During almost fifteen centuries has the legal establishment of Christianity been on trial,” he wrote in 1785. “What have been its fruits?” he asked. “More or less in all places, pride and indolence in the clergy, ignorance and servility in the laity; in both, superstition, bigotry and persecution.” That hardly sounds like someone using the Bible as a template for self-government.

Hawley had more to say. The Bible “gave us equality between men and women,” he claimed. The biblical record is dubious — in Genesis, God says husbands should rule their wives. But it’s clear America’s founders didn’t consider men and women politically equal at all.

Racial equality? The Constitution enabled human bondage. Maybe that did come from the Bible: “Slaves, be obedient to those who are your masters,” the New Testament says. It took a civil war to pry that thought away from the American experiment.

Other parts of the Hawley address were equally absurd. The Republican senator said the Bible, and therefore the Constitution, enabled the “common man” to rule, and not a “clique or an elite.” The founders were many things, but they were hardly representatives of the “common man.”

Normally, we might reject these ideas as the ramblings of an arrogant, partisan senator. But imposing a biblical structure on American self-government is a real danger in our own time: Hawley and fellow travelers continuously seek to impose their beliefs on school curricula, equal rights, bodily autonomy and a host of other issues.

We oppose any attempt, by Josh Hawley or anyone else, to impose any religious framework on our government. Americans are free to think for themselves. That’s what the First Amendment guarantee of free religious exercise is all about.

In his speech Monday, Hawley insulted that idea. That should worry all of us.

This editorial first appeared in The Kansas City Star last Friday. This commentary should be considered another point of view and not necessarily the opinion or editorial policy of The Dominion Post.